??◆双语阅览
?
move along, not much to see here. that seemed to be the message from openai last week, about an experiment to see whether its advanced ai chatbot gpt-4 could help science-savvy individuals make and release a biological weapon.?
?
走吧，这儿没有啥可看的。这如同是上星期环绕openal打开的一项实验传达出的信息，实验的主题是openai的晋级版人工智能谈天机器人gpt-4是不是可以协助科学技能专家制造和发布生物武器。
?
the chatbot “provided at most a mild uplift” to those efforts, openai announced, though it added that more work on the subject was urgently needed. headlines reprised the comforting conclusion that the large language model was not a terrorist’s cookbook.
?
openai宣告，这个谈天机器人在这些方面“最多供给了一点细小的协助”，尽管他们弥补说这个领域还火急需要更多的作业。新闻标题重申了抚慰性结论，即这个大型言语模型并非惊骇分子的烹饪手册（辅导书）。
?
dig deeper into the research, however, and things look a little less reassuring. at almost every stage of the imagined process, from sourcing a biological agent to scaling it up and releasing it, participants armed with gpt-4 were able to inch closer to their villainous goal than rivals using the internet alone.
?
可是，假定进一步深化研讨，情况就没那么令人定心了。在我们能愿望得到的进程的几乎每个期间，不管是寻找生物制剂、进行扩展出产仍是发布，运用gpt-4的参加人员，比仅依托互联网的竞赛对手更接近他们凶暴的方针。
?
the chief takeaway from the exercise should not be a sense of relief. “[open ai] ought to be pretty worried by these results,” wrote gary marcus, a commentator who has testified on ai oversight before a us s
enate committee, last week in his widely read newsletter.
?
这个实验的首要收成不大约是一种安心感。在美国参议院一个委员会前就人工智能监管疑问作证的谈论员加里?马库斯上星期在他广受重视的时局通讯中写道：“[open ai] 对这些成果大约非常忧虑。”
?
so should we. we need better independent mechanisms for realistically assessing and curbing such threats. just as we do not permit drug companies to rule on the safety of medicines, ai risk evaluation cannot be left to the industry alone.
?
咱们也大约如此。咱们需要非常好的独立机制对这些挟制打开实际地评价和遏止。就像咱们不答应药物公司来评价药物的平安性相同，ai风险评价不能只是交给作业自个来处置。
?
这篇文章节选自：financial times（金融时报）
发布时刻：2024.02
作者：anjana ahuja
原文标题：ai’s bioterrorism potential should not be ruled out?
?
◆词汇堆集
?
1.savvy
?/?s?v?/?
n. 实践常识，领会
v. 了解，懂
adj. 聪明的，有经历的
?
2.reprise
/r??pri?z/?
n. (尤指乐曲的)重复有些，再现部；重复，重演
v. 重复(乐曲)，重演
?
3. reassure
?/?ri??????/
v. 使安心，使消除疑虑
?
4.inch
/?nt?/?
n. 英寸; (间隔或数量)少量; 身高，腰围
v. (数量)逐步添加(或削减); (使)缓慢移动
?
5. villainous
/?v?l?n?s/
adj. 罪恶的；恶棍的；凶狠的；坏透的
?
6.takeaway
/?te?k??we?/
n. 外卖食物；外卖饭馆；要害
?
7. commentator
?/?k?m?n?te?t?/?
n. 现场说明员，实况播音员; 谈论员
◆词组分配
?
1.rule on ?对…做出判决
?
◆写作句总结
?
the chief?takeaway?from the exercise should not be a sense of relief.
规划：the chief?takeaway?from … should be a sense of relief.
…的首要收成大约是一种安心感。
例句：the chief?takeaway?from general physical examination should be a sense of relief.????